Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal ascites an independent prognostic factor in severe preeclampsia: a matched cohort study

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preeclampsia is a multi-systemic, multi-organ dysfunction associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications. The presence of maternal ascites, a manifestation of endothelial dysfunction and increased capillary permeability, is shown to be associated with adverse outcomes. We aim to investigate the impact of maternal ascites on pregnancy outcome in women with severe preeclampsia.

Methods

A matched cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India between March 2014 and March 2015. One hundred and twenty-one severe preeclamptic women with ascites formed the study cohort while age-, parity-, and gestational age-matched group of 121 severe preeclamptic women without ascites formed the control. Primary outcome was the composite maternal adverse outcome defined as the development of any of eclampsia, pulmonary edema, renal failure, or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Secondary outcome was the composite perinatal outcome defined as the occurrence of any of still birth, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or early neonatal death.

Results

Four maternal deaths occurred in the study group. The rates of pregnancies with composite maternal adverse outcome [42 vs 9% RR 4.6 (95% CI 2.5–8.4)] and composite perinatal adverse outcome [36 vs 17% RR 2.1, (95% CI 1.3–3.3)] were significantly more in ascites group than in control group. After adjusting for other confounding variables, ascites was independently associated with adverse maternal events [adjusted OR 16.40 (95% CI 2.88–93.31)] but not adverse perinatal outcome.

Conclusion

In women with severe preeclampsia, maternal ascites is an independent risk factor for adverse maternal outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duley L (2009) The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 33:130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mignini LE, Villar J, Khan KS (2006) Mapping the theories of preeclampsia: the need for systematic reviews of mechanisms of the disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merviel P, Carbillon L, Challier JC, Rabreau M, Beaufils M, Uzan S (2004) Pathophysiology of preeclampsia: links with implantation disorders. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115(2):134–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013) Hypertension in pregnancy: report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 122(5):1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, Watson HG (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Br J Haematol 145:24–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS (1976) Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 33:695–706

    Google Scholar 

  7. Figueras F, Gratacós E (2014) Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 36:86–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deruelle P, Coudoux E, Ego A, Houfflin-Debarge V, Codaccioni X, Subtil D (2006) Risk factors for post-partum complications occurring after preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. A study in 453 consecutive pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006(125):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Woods JB, Blake PG, Perry KG Jr, Magann EF, Martin RW, Martin JN Jr (1992) Ascites: a portent of cardiopulmonary complications in the preeclamptic patient with the syndrome of hemolysis elevated liver enzymes and low platelets. Obstet Gynecol 80:87–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woo JS, Liang ST, Wong VT (1982) Ultrasonic detection of maternal ascites in patients with severe preeclampsia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 22:237–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cong KJ, Wang TT (1994) Complications of ascites in pregnancy induced hypertension. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 29(1):7–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ashmore J, Attapattu JA (1998) Massive ascites and bilateral hydrothorax complicating severe pre-eclampsia. Ceylon Med J 43:235–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Foreman CS Jr (1989) Massive ascites as a complication of severe pre-eclampsia. A case report. J Reprod Med 34:307–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

AK, Prof SSR, and YSJ conceived the study. All authors (AK, YSJ, MK, DKM, VP, and SR) contributed to the design. YSJ carried out the data collection and guarantees data integrity. AK performed statistical analyses. AK and MK critically reviewed the analysis. All authors (AK, YSJ, MK, DKM, VP, and SR) contributed to the drafting, revising, and finalization of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anish Keepanasseril.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were done with the ethical standards set by the Institute Scientific Advisory and Ethical committee (Human Studies), in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Study was approved by the Institute Ethics committee (Human Studies), JIPMER, Pondicherry, India (JIP/IEC/SC/2014/3/557). Informed consent was obtained from all women participated in the study.

Funding

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 210 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suriya, J.Y., Keepanasseril, A., Manikandan, K. et al. Maternal ascites an independent prognostic factor in severe preeclampsia: a matched cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 63–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4407-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4407-8

Keywords

Navigation